with respect to high-income, low-income people tend to take on more indirect tax burden. Direct tax is usually a progressive tax,louboutin pas cher, as opposed to low-income, high-income earners tend to assume more direct tax burden. This means that the vast majority of China’s tax revenues have regressive in nature and is mainly responsible for the regressive tax high-income earners who are not.Oriental Morning Post: “paid by the company,christian louboutin pas cher,” they reflect?Aim: It is also said that 8.9 trillion yuan of tax revenue,louis vuitton borse, the proportion paid by enterprises of all types to the government is 92%. This shows that China’s tax base comes from businesses. Corporate tax of course also able to achieve the purpose of regulating the distribution of income, but it is, after all, is indirect. Strictly speaking, it is the adjustment of income distribution adjustment of income distribution of residents directly affected by the tax on the income can really happen, only that the remaining 8% of revenue. Of which a little more than 6%,louis vuitton sac pas cher, that is, we are talking about a tax. In addition to other taxes are difficult to achieve the purpose of adjusting the income distribution.Oriental Morning Post: So the “price channel,louboutin pas cher, companies pay a” tax structure in China, the government wants to do something even if it is difficult to have a place to start?Aim: to adjust the tax structure for the current China is concerned, is a very difficult thing. The reason is simple, one is the concept of the Chinese people do not have such a tax base, on the other hand, collection and management mechanism of the tax authorities do not have such capabilities.Wrong tax concept:Ignore the indirect tax only careOriental Morning Post: Tax idea?Aim: before 30 years of reform and opening up, the state propaganda on individual socialist countries are saying is not taxable.
taxation should play with or to the implementation of specific taxes, through specific taxes to achieve.Oriental Morning Post: But most people intuitively react just personal income tax?Aim: more than just a tax. When you put our tax embodied in one specific taxes, we should ponder: what taxes to achieve by adjusting the income allocated? In the current China, this is a very troublesome thing.Oriental Morning Post: This is related to the tax structure?Aim: Yes. For China’s tax structure,sac a main louis vuitton, I have two words highly summarized. I think it remains a classic,sac louis vuitton occasion, because nobody has said this: First, take the price channel, the second is paid by the companies.Let me take the price channel. 2011 China’s total tax revenue of about 8.9 trillion yuan,louis vuiton, of which more than 70% belong to the revenue from the turnover tax. China’s turnover tax basically means four taxes: VAT, sales tax,basket louboutin femme, excise tax,achat louboutin pas cher, customs duties. Turnover tax are indirect taxes that can be passed on,chaussure louboutin pas cher, is paying taxes and who ultimately bear the tax burden is not the same person. What, then, is passed through what channels to achieve this it? The tax is added to the price of goods and services were to be passed on to consumers in the way to achieve. How can you expect to pass this tax about 70% to adjust the income allocated?Next, a more important question is: this is not only indirect tax adjustment of income distribution,louis vuitton homme, the results may also worsen income distribution. In theory, we are also called indirect taxes regressive tax. In other words, the higher the income of the people, they assume the amount of indirect percentage of their income, but lower. This is determined by the so-called Engel’s law. Conversely.
but can play a substantive role in regulating difficult to find a place to start. Besides redistribution, we immediately think of the main taxes. Some people will think of Social Security, but in China is largely identical to the Social Security tax, might put the tax and social security contributions seen as a channel through which the so-called redistribution through taxes.Oriental Morning Post: the sense that the government does not tax purposes is the “Robin Hood” it?Aim: Robin Hood called out of fat or thin,portafogli louis vuitton, the main clue is through to high-income earners and more ways to get a portion of the income tax,lv, and through the transfer expenditure approach and give low-income people or people in need of relief. In which the government is essentially a middleman,louis vuitton soldes, setter, which is redistribution. Such a distribution pattern theoretically non-professionals to imagine that there is no problem,louis vuitton chaussures, but afraid you inquisitive. Why? Because of the professionals,lv, the tax is not just an abstract concept,sac louis vuitton, but by one specific tax composition. That regulation.
create the impression that the socialist countries are not taxable, only capitalist countries levy individual fishes tax.
相关的主题文章：

 
  http://osacforum.com/showthread.php?46222-chaussur-louboutin-homme-pas-cher&p=46488#post46488
 
  http://bbs.cangbox.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=165602&fromuid=10805
 
  http://bbs.greenteam.org.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=88214
 
  http://juezhanjianghu.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=223
 
  http://npuc.cc/home.php?mod=space&uid=2719
 
  http://hsxmh.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=3440
 
  http://www.dsqdh.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=41679&fromuid=3591
 
  http://dadezhengtang.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=85885