Nanfang Daily (Reporter / Liu Guannan Rongming Chang) yesterday, Mr. Hong Guangzhou people’s bank accounts had been forced to draw away 1.1 million yuan, is planning to go this huge sum of money to come to the provinces of the two Zhengzhou City judges. However, the money was designated to go, and they even did not produce any legal instrument. Ang questioned in the absence of any relationship between credit and debt situation, even their own bank accounts being emptied,louboutin homme pas cher, two judges of the Court of Zhengzhou Jinshui suspected of using public power for personal affairs.
With no large sums of money, according to the site, said no plans to go to delimit
When April 9, Guangzhou citizens Ang to a bank and Mr. Qin Wuyang check their joint account,ray ban wayfarer prezzo, the defendant know the name of 1.1 million yuan in cash was Zhengzhou City People’s Court to freeze the two judges, and to force planning to go. Mr. Hong was shocked that he does not have any legal dispute, what from my account, “stealing money”? Mr. Hung on the spot and two judges confront this, the other says Mr. Hong money is someone else’s name,http://gwxd.vicp.net:8085/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=2146746, but refused to produce any legal instrument.
Yesterday, in the absence of any description of the relationship between credit and debt situation, which forced two judges plan to go ahead this frozen 1.1 million of money.
Cause the debtor to sell stolen lead seal housing dispute
It is understood that things originated in Guangzhou Jia × Xin Ji woman.
2008, Jia × Xin Lin creditors owed 200 million, was sentenced to pay back the money in Guangzhou’s Yuexiu court. Jia × Sim is not yet due, in October that year,http://www.ibizstore.com/K/item/create_form/1, Jia × Xin name of a house located in Zengcheng were sealed by the court. Period, she was the illegal seizure of the house will be sold to Lo.
Lo in part to pay back the principal, the court found that this is suddenly seized property and can not transfer, huff to the court after the court Zengcheng sides closed in mediation. Mediation content: Lo first stay at the house when the house after the transfer, then the remaining balance due of about 100 million to Jia × Sim.
Check after the seizure of the house with the applicant Lo Lin creditors agreed: LU 1.1 million payment, the creditors involved in the application re-opened real estate, help Lu transfer. In July 2009, it re-opened as 1.1 million yuan deposit, to be present on both sides trust Mr. Qin and Mr. Hung’s joint account.
Jia × Sim about the incident, in order to transfer housing to the grounds, Mr. Xiang Lu ask for the balance due of more than 100 million. Lu believes that concluded between himself and creditors are exclusive agreement, the house is not logical to pay off the debt after Jia re-opened, and therefore refused to give money.
Just under Jia ×  circumstances should more than 100 million of the balance due and not on Mr. Qin and Mr. Hung joint account 1.1 million yuan, but as mentioned above,http://bbs.chdxc.org/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=745655, is Zhengzhou judge to “payment order” form, forced to draw away. According to reporter Lin creditors analysis, which 1.1 million yuan, eventually falling into the Jia × Xin pockets.
Lin doubt, Zhengzhou hands of the judges “payment order” is actually a fake debt disputes. Originally, Jia × Sim can not get there from the Lo 1.1 million, is very “coincidence” to owe a man named Lee 1.1 million. Lee Zhengzhou courts apply a “payment order” in the form of repayment requirements Jia Jia said I have a house in Lo, where the balance due, you go to him. Accordingly case, two judges of the Court of Zhengzhou Goldwater,moncler prezzi, even in not served any legal instrument, draw away than other natural name Lo 110 million.
Questioned two doubtful whether favoritism torture
Guangzhou Judge: accepting illegal
“This case should be refused ‘provinces’.” Reporters interviewed on the matter of judges Guangzhou City Intermediate People’s Court Executive Board. Guangzhou, the judge said,tiffany roma, our law for the “payment order” is used, there are strict restrictions, first, should be accepted by the court where the defendant. According to the Public household inquiry, the defendant Jia × Sim account the location in Guangzhou, its habitual residence is not within the scope of Zhengzhou Jinshui, the district court accepted Lee’s “payment order” application, in violation of the law, should be invalid.
Secondly, you must clear the relationship between credit and debt, legal cases to apply “the payment order.” In this case, the bank “Personal Deposit Account provides real-name system,” Mr. Hong and Mr. Qin this money ownership. Even if there is a court decision and prove Mr. Lu Jia × Xin debt relationship, can not buckle Ang money. Not to mention this incident, Zhengzhou City People’s Court and was not served any legal documents to Mr. Hong and Mr. Qin, without informing them afterwards, and civil judgments is not in force Mr. Hong and Mr. Qin confirmation payments owed to others. Guangzhou judge said that this civil dispute with the “payment order” approach itself is not appropriate. “Payment order” is often used to require the payment of wages and other debt-clear case.
Party: Alleged capricious
Ang believes that the judge forced to reach out to the private account money, is tantamount to robbery.
The incident, Mr. Hung questioned why things coincidence? Their joint account,http://www.chrisadamsperfumes.com/index.php?item/create_form/1, there are 1.1 million yuan,http://www.zhubaojie.com/club/home.php?mod=space&uid=2637,tiffany italia, while Jia × Sim also happens to owe 1.1 million. “This figure is so coincidentally, the court has perverted the law of suspects.” Mr. Hong told reporters, according to the law, the judge and the parties may not travel together in different places,http://ntyuli.com/pic/Review.asp?NewsID=761, but as far as he can see,http://www.ziyoso.com/zhidao/question.php?qid=200629, the two judges of the Court of Goldwater, travel with a so-called debtor husband. And there is evidence that a third person Mr. Lu, Lu Li-called application executor, Mr. Lu has been in accordance with the requirements of Jia × Xin, the part of the housing fund remitted to the Li Lu’s name,http://www.investinginmauritania.org/index.php/forum/suggestion-box/331843-4wi2l08kh6#331741, thus most likely suspect Lee Jia × Sheen’s relatives or friends.